![]() |
![]() | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2002 election featured an unprecented effort by supporters of privatization to lie about and distort their record on Social Security. In response, the Campaign for America’s Future launched a truth squad effort called "Reading Between the Lies." Below is the full collection of these pieces as well as a number of other press releases and reports that we distributed for the 2002 debate. PDF “Democrats won the Social Security debate in 2002.” 01/07/03 PDF “Adam Taff Tries to Mislead Voters, Reporters about Social Security.” PDF "Cutting Benefits, Increasing Risk: Lindsey Graham's Legislation to Partially Privatize Social Security." Also see press release. 10/28/02 Web | PDF “Tom Latham Endorsed Mandatory Private Investment of Social Security: Latham plan would require everyone to lose Social Security benefits while taking more risk.” PDF “New Report: Greg Ganske’s Legislation to Partially Privatize Social Security.” PDF “New Report: John Sununu’s Legislation to Partially Privatize Social Security.” Web | PDF “NJ Senate Candidate Doug Forrester Gets Caught Misleading Voters: New York Times points out that Republicans have called private accounts “privatization” for years.” Web | PDF “New Group Has Social Security Pledge . . . For Privatization: Right-wing pledge will expose candidates who claim that privatization is different from private accounts.” Web | PDF “Wayne Allard Sponsored Bill to Partially Privatize Social Security: Meanwhile, new Allard ad says there has ‘never been a vote’ on privatization in the Senate – but there has, and he voted for it, twice.” PDF “Campaign for PDF “GOPAC radio ad claims that Social Security is ‘reverse Reparations’: Republican PAC Pitches Bush’s Social Security Plans to African Americans.” Web | PDF “NRCC memo accuses reporters of "taking sides in the midterm elections" if they use the word "privatization" to describe "personal accounts.” Web | PDF “Elizabeth Dole Dances Around Issue of Partial Privatization for Social Security: Five questions about Social Security for Elizabeth Dole.” Web | PDF “Who will keep the politicians honest in election 2002? Campaign for Web | PDF “Election Strategy for Social Security Privatizers – Lie and Mislead Voters: No matter what you call it, diverting Social Security funds into stock investments will cut guaranteed benefits and increase risk.” Web | PDF “John Thune is Hiding His Views on Social Security, and He is Lying about Sen. Tim Johnson’s.” Web | PDF “Is Rep. Gekas Flip-Flopping… or Double-Dealing? Gekas’ Social Security and Medicare positions suddenly change.” PDF “Tim Hutchinson: A Reliable Vote for Wall Street Plans to Gamble Social Security in the Stock Market.” |
|
|||||||||